- RSS loading...
The Numbers Are In (2025): Week 03 Recap
Kris Caballero • Sep 25, 2025 • 0 comments • Talkin' NFL
We're looking back and reviewing the action, both in betting and [fantasy] picks for Week 03 in the NFL. Some teams come in with an impressive 2-0 start, but you ilkely have guessed, that has changed. Lots could be said in terms of gameplay, but what about the numbers? What do they tell us? You're reading our very first post reviewing the numbers all over the NFL!
Source |
Team |
On Open |
On Close |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BetMGM | Miami Dolphins | +12.5 | O 49.5 | +575 | +11.5 | O 50.5 (over) | +600 | ||
| Buffalo Bills | -12.5 | U 49.5 | -800 | -11.5 | U 50.5 (under) | -900 | |||
By the Public |
MoneyLine |
Spread |
Total Points |
MoneyLine |
Spread |
Total Points |
|||
| Public Bet | Miami Dolphins | 2% | 30% | 16% | 4% | 28% | 20% | ||
| Buffalo Bills | 98% | 70% | 84% | 96% | 72% | 80% | |||
| Public Money | Miami Dolphins | 7% | 43% | 60% | 3% | 53% | 71% | ||
| Buffalo Bills | 93% | 57% | 40% | 97% | 47% | 29% | |||
| Yahoo! Sports: Pick Your Winner picks | Miami Dolphins | 15% | 17% | ||||||
| Buffalo Bills | 85% | 83% | |||||||
Total picks |
10,028 | 25,730 | |||||||
| MSN Sports: Pick the Winner picks | Miami Dolphins | N/A | |||||||
| Buffalo Bills | N/A | ||||||||
| Box Score | Miami Dolphins | 21 | |||||||
| Buffalo Bills | 31 | ||||||||
Bets that won were Point Spread—MIA +11.5), Total Points—MIA O 50.5, and MoneyLine—BUF -900.
One significant change that occurred for this game was the Money Line for Buffalo, shifting from -800 to -900. Big line shifts like that aren't anything new, but proved the big wagers and bets for Buffalo who ended up giving Miami their third loss of the season.
Going into Week 03, a handful of teams went in with a 2-0 record, while some were at 0-2. It may have been unanimous for some teams to jump on in undefeated, right? Let's check in the results and see what happen, including Monday Night Football:
Source |
Team |
On Open |
On Close |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BetMGM | Green Bay Packers | -7.5 | O 41.5 | -450 | -7.5 | O 41.5 | -450 | ||
| Cleveland Browns | +7.5 | U 41.5 | +350 | +7.5 | U 41.5 | +350 | |||
By the Public |
MoneyLine |
Spread |
Total Points |
MoneyLine |
Spread |
Total Points |
|||
| Public Bet | Green Bay Packers | 97% | 51% | 28% | 98% | 54% | 31% | ||
| Cleveland Browns | 3% | 49% | 72% | 2% | 46% | 69% | |||
| Public Money | Green Bay Packers | N/A | N/A | N/A | 100% | 44% | 27% | ||
| Cleveland Browns | N/A | N/A | N/A | 0% | 56% | 73% | |||
| Yahoo! Sports: Pick Your Winner picks | Green Bay Packers | 82% | 81% | ||||||
| Cleveland Browns | 18% | 19% | |||||||
Total picks |
17,895 | 22,272 | |||||||
| MSN Sports: Pick the Winner picks | Green Bay Packers | 92% | |||||||
| Cleveland Browns | 8% | ||||||||
| Box Score | Green Bay Packers | 10 | |||||||
| Cleveland Browns | 13 | ||||||||
Bets on Cleveland, by means of what we'll call the "Top 3," Money Line, Spread, and Total Points, all won. You'd think that despite the early struggles while facing a Jordan Love-led Packers would mean it'd be a clean sweep, right? Not with this game, and you can thank Andre Szmyt for the game-winning kick. Both Browns fans and bettors came away happy.
Source |
Team |
On Open |
On Close |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BetMGM | Indianapolis Colts | -4.5 | O 43.5 | -220 | -6 | O 42.5 | -275 | ||
| Tennessee Titans | +4.5 | U 43.5 | +180 | +6 | U 42.5 | +225 | |||
By the Public |
MoneyLine |
Spread |
Total Points |
MoneyLine |
Spread |
Total Points |
|||
| Public Bet | Indianapolis Colts | 93% | 51% | 28% | 93% | 54% | 31% | ||
| Tennessee Titans | 7% | 49% | 72% | 7% | 46% | 69% | |||
| Public Money | Indianapolis Colts | 98% | 72% | 43% | 97% | 68% | 53% | ||
| Tennessee Titans | 4% | 28% | 57% | 3% | 32% | 47% | |||
| Yahoo! Sports: Pick Your Winner picks | Indianapolis Colts | 79% | 77% | ||||||
| Tennessee Titans | 21% | 23% | |||||||
Total picks |
14,113 | 17,471 | |||||||
| MSN Sports: Pick the Winner picks | Indianapolis Colts | 88% | |||||||
| Tennessee Titans | 12% | ||||||||
| Box Score | Indianapolis Colts | 41 | |||||||
| Tennessee Titans | 20 | ||||||||
For those who bet on the side of Indianapolis, be it Point Spread, Total Points AND Money Line, won for this game. Serious question: Were the Titans even trying? In hockey, they'd call a three-goal score a "hat trick;" in this case that term can be applied for Jonathan Taylor scoring 3 touchdowns for this game. Fans won't need to throw their hats onto the field, but something tells us that a player scoring a "hat trick" in a game like this, almost always guarantees a win. Impressive game by the Colts this week.
Source |
Team |
On Open |
On Close |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BetMGM | Cincinnati Bengals | +3 | O 41.5 | +130 | +3 | O 42.5 | +140 | ||
| Minnesota Vikings | -3 | U 41.5 | -155 | -3 | U 42.5 | -165 | |||
By the Public |
MoneyLine |
Spread |
Total Points |
MoneyLine |
Spread |
Total Points |
|||
| Public Bet | Cincinnati Bengals | 33% | 62% | 25% | 33% | 63% | 28% | ||
| Minnesota Vikings | 67% | 38% | 75% | 67% | 37% | 72% | |||
| Public Money | Cincinnati Bengals | 31% | 58% | 29% | 26% | 57% | 33% | ||
| Minnesota VIkings | 69% | 42% | 71% | 74% | 43% | 67% | |||
| Yahoo! Sports: Pick Your Winner picks | Cincinnati Bengals | 44% | 43% | ||||||
| Minnesota Vikings | 56% | 57% | |||||||
Total picks |
16,084 | 19,934 | |||||||
| MSN Sports: Pick the Winner picks | Cincinnati Bengals | 40% | |||||||
| Minnesota Vikings | 60% | ||||||||
| Box Score | Cincinnati Bengals | 10 | |||||||
| Minnesota Vikings | 48 | ||||||||
Despite the blowout, Point Spread and Money Line won in this regard on the side of Minnesota; Total Points won on the side of Cincinnati. As for the game, the score at one point was 40-3; we're guessing that many fans didn't even have a chance to finish their meal(s) having seen that. With Joe Burrow out for this game, it looked like a cakewalk for the Vikings.
Source |
Team |
On Open |
On Close |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BetMGM | Pittsburgh Steelers | -1.5 | O 44.5 | -125 | -1 | O 44.5 | -118 | ||
| New England Patriots | +1.5 | U 44.5 | +105 | +1 | U 44.5 | -102 | |||
By the Public |
MoneyLine |
Spread |
Total Points |
MoneyLine |
Spread |
Total Points |
|||
| Public Bet | Pittsburgh Steelers | 69% | 17% | 25% | 68% | 19% | 26% | ||
| New England Patriots | 31% | 83% | 75% | 32% | 81% | 74% | |||
| Public Money | Pittsburgh Steelers | 72% | 62% | 24% | 65% | 48% | 38% | ||
| New England Patriots | 28% | 38% | 76% | 35% | 52% | 62% | |||
| Yahoo! Sports: Pick Your Winner picks | Pittsburgh Steelers | 63% | 62% | ||||||
| New England Patriots | 37% | 38% | |||||||
Total picks |
16,631 | 20,783 | |||||||
| MSN Sports: Pick the Winner picks | Pittsburgh Steelers | 69% | |||||||
| New England Patriots | 31% | ||||||||
| Box Score | Pittsburgh Steelers | 21 | |||||||
| New England Patriots | 14 | ||||||||
Good game all throughout, as both teams kept each other within distance in terms of score. Despite the Point Spread being at -1, Calvin Austin III's touchdown in the fourth, close to 2 minutes left, helped Steelers cover the spread. In addition to the Money Line, won on the side of Steelers, the final score of 21-14 meant it was under 44.5 thus having Patriots win. This was another great game on Sunday.
Source |
Team |
On Open |
On Close |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BetMGM | New Orleans Saints | +7 | O 41.5 | +310 | +7 | O 41.5 | +310 | ||
| Seattle Seahawks | -7 | U 41.5 | -400 | -7 | U 41.5 | -400 | |||
By the Public |
MoneyLine |
Spread |
Total Points |
MoneyLine |
Spread |
Total Points |
|||
| Public Bet | New Orleans Saints | 3% | 40% | 48% | 4% | 41% | 50% | ||
| Seattle Seahawks | 97% | 60% | 52% | 96% | 59% | 50% | |||
| Public Money | New Orleans Saints | 1% | 35% | 58% | 1% | 42% | 61% | ||
| Seattle Seahawks | 99% | 65% | 42% | 99% | 58% | 39% | |||
| Yahoo! Sports: Pick Your Winner picks | New Orleans Saints | 16% | 17% | ||||||
| Seattle Seahawks | 84% | 83% | |||||||
Total picks |
13,172 | 17,055 | |||||||
| MSN Sports: Pick the Winner picks | New Orleans Saints | 15% | |||||||
| Seattle Seahawks | 85% | ||||||||
| Box Score | New Orleans Saints | 13 | |||||||
| Seattle Seahawks | 44 | ||||||||
Tory Horton's 95-yard touchdown was the highlight of this game; absolutely impressive. The Saints fall to 0-3 and looked rather dry from the get-go. For the bets, Seattle won two out of the three: Point Spread and Money Line, while the Total Points went in favor of Nev Orleans. It's only a matter of time the Saints will seek their first win, their next matchup against Buffalo. We know Buffalo cleaned slate last week on Thursday Night, as there's a likelihood that they'll hand Saints their fourth loss. Nevertheless, this game was already in the books, including for bettors.
Source |
Team |
On Open |
On Close |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BetMGM | Denver Broncos | +3 | O 46 | +130 | +2.5 | O 46 | +130 | ||
| Los Angeles Chargers | -3 | U 46 | -155 | -2.5 | U 46 | -155 | |||
By the Public |
MoneyLine |
Spread |
Total Points |
MoneyLine |
Spread |
Total Points |
|||
| Public Bet | Denver Broncos | 10% | 39% | 27% | 10% | 43% | 30% | ||
| Los Angeles Chargers | 90% | 61% | 73% | 90% | 57% | 70% | |||
| Public Money | Denver Broncos | 12% | 34% | 30% | 6% | 40% | 44% | ||
| Los Angeles Chargers | 88% | 66% | 70% | 94% | 60% | 56% | |||
| Yahoo! Sports: Pick Your Winner picks | Denver Broncos | 28% | 28% | ||||||
| Los Angeles Chargers | 72% | 72% | |||||||
Total picks |
13,548 | 18,017 | |||||||
| MSN Sports: Pick the Winner picks | Denver Broncos | 48% | |||||||
| Los Angeles Chargers | 52% | ||||||||
| Box Score | Denver Broncos | 20 | |||||||
| Los Angeles Chargers | 23 | ||||||||
Another impressive game on Sunday featuring these two. Much like the Steelers-Patriots, this game was coming down to the wire, and the Chargers sealed the deal. For bettors of the Chargers also won on all three: Point Spread, Total Points and Money Line. We're not sure if such term has been used in American football, but a team winning the game, including their odds, is truly a Grand Slam. Mark this as another exciting game that took place on Sunday.
Source |
Team |
On Open |
On Close |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BetMGM | Arizona Cardinals | +2.5 | O 45.5 | +115 | +1.5 | O 44.5 | +105 | ||
| San Francisco 49ers | -2.5 | U 45.5 | -135 | -1.5 | U 44.5 | -125 | |||
By the Public |
MoneyLine |
Spread |
Total Points |
MoneyLine |
Spread |
Total Points |
|||
| Public Bet | Arizona Cardinals | 23% | 57% | 33% | 24% | 57% | 35% | ||
| San Francisco 49ers | 77% | 43% | 67% | 76% | 43% | 65% | |||
| Public Money | Arizona Cardinals | 71% | 80% | 41% | 62% | 67% | 48% | ||
| San Francisco 49ers | 29% | 20% | 59% | 38% | 33% | 52% | |||
| Yahoo! Sports: Pick Your Winner picks | Arizona Cardinals | 30% | 31% | ||||||
| San Francisco 49ers | 70% | 69% | |||||||
Total picks |
15,223 | 20,261 | |||||||
| MSN Sports: Pick the Winner picks | Arizona Cardinals | 32% | |||||||
| San Francisco 49ers | 68% | ||||||||
| Box Score | Arizona Cardinals | 15 | |||||||
| San Francisco 49ers | 16 | ||||||||
This game started slow, then picked up later with Cardinals scoring their first touchdown in the fourth quarter. As you saw, this was a field goal game. On the betting side, the gap was quite close between these two, resulting in a slight 'nail-biter.' Betting on the side of Arizona, per Point Spread, was the only section that won; the rest, Total Points and Money Line went to bettors of San Francisco. All in all, this was a great game, especially if you enjoy field goals.
Source |
Team |
On Open |
On Close |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BetMGM | Los Angeles Rams | +3.5 | O 44.5 | +155 | +3.5 | O 45.5 | +165 | ||
| Philadelphia Eagles | -3.5 | U 44.5 | -190 | -3.5 | U 45.5 | -200 | |||
By the Public |
MoneyLine |
Spread |
Total Points |
MoneyLine |
Spread |
Total Points |
|||
| Public Bet | Los Angeles Rams | 8% | 36% | 21% | 8% | 38% | 23% | ||
| Philadelphia Eagles | 92% | 64% | 79% | 92% | 62% | 77% | |||
| Public Money | Los Angeles Rams | 9% | 57% | 25% | 11% | 55% | 46% | ||
| Philadelphia Eagles | 91% | 43% | 75% | 89% | 45% | 54% | |||
| Yahoo! Sports: Pick Your Winner picks | Los Angeles Rams | 29% | 30% | ||||||
| Philadelphia Eagles | 71% | 70% | |||||||
Total picks |
16,720 | 20,889 | |||||||
| MSN Sports: Pick the Winner picks | Los Angeles Rams | 47% | |||||||
| Philadelphia Eagles | 53% | ||||||||
| Box Score | Los Angeles Rams | 26 | |||||||
| Philadelphia Eagles | 33 | ||||||||
Another nail-biter down to the wire; sealed the deal thanks to the blocked kick from Joshua Karty on behalf of Jordan Davis. Rams were solid throughout the game, until third quarter when things shifted in the way of Philadelphia. As for betting, LA had Total Points won, over 45.5, while Philadelphia took the cake on the other betting sections. Talk about a wild conclusion, but was a great game.
Source |
Team |
On Open |
On Close |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BetMGM | New York Jets | +6.5 | O 43 | +240 | +6.5 | O 43 | +260 | ||
| Tampa Bay Buccaneers | -6.5 | U 43 | -300 | -6.5 | U 43 | -325 | |||
By the Public |
MoneyLine |
Spread |
Total Points |
MoneyLine |
Spread |
Total Points |
|||
| Public Bet | New York Jets | 3% | 59% | 17% | 3% | 55% | 19% | ||
| Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 97% | 41% | 83% | 97% | 45% | 81% | |||
| Public Money | New York Jets | 3% | 57% | 16% | 3% | 51% | 18% | ||
| Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 97% | 43% | 84% | 97% | 49% | 82% | |||
| Yahoo! Sports: Pick Your Winner picks | New York Jets | 13% | 13% | ||||||
| Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 87% | 87% | |||||||
Total picks |
14,033 | 17,274 | |||||||
| MSN Sports: Pick the Winner picks | New York Jets | 13% | |||||||
| Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 87% | ||||||||
| Box Score | New York Jets | 27 | |||||||
| Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 29 | ||||||||
These great games keep on coming, and this one was no exception. What looked like a Jets win, thanks to a great block and a touchdown by Will McDonald IV, the Buccaneers regained and won the game. For the betting side, Money Line for the Buccaneers was the only section that won; the other two belonged to the Jets (congratulations to the 50+% bettors who won). Another great game coming down to the wire and a treat for Tampa Bay fans.
Source |
Team |
On Open |
On Close |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BetMGM | Altanta Falcons | -5.5 | O 43.5 | -250 | -4.5 | O 44 | -250 | ||
| Carolina Panthers | +5.5 | U 43.5 | +200 | +4.5 | U 44 | +200 | |||
By the Public |
MoneyLine |
Spread |
Total Points |
MoneyLine |
Spread |
Total Points |
|||
| Public Bet | Atlanta Falcons | 92% | 38% | 16% | 92% | 43% | 18% | ||
| Carolina Panthers | 8% | 62% | 84% | 8% | 57% | 82% | |||
| Public Money | Atlanta Falcons | 94% | 90% | 20% | 96% | 87% | 23% | ||
| Carolina Panthers | 6% | 10% | 80% | 4% | 13% | 77% | |||
| Yahoo! Sports: Pick Your Winner picks | Atlanta Falcons | 79% | 78% | ||||||
| Carolina Panthers | 21% | 22% | |||||||
Total picks |
12,389 | 15,232 | |||||||
| MSN Sports: Pick the Winner picks | Atlanta Falcons | 82% | |||||||
| Carolina Panthers | 18% | ||||||||
| Box Score | Atlanta Falcons | 0 | |||||||
| Carolina Panthers | 30 | ||||||||
Riddled with interceptions, plus a solid defense, Carolina embarrassed the heck out of Atlanta. No more needs to be said after that final score. On the betting side, bets on Carolina won all three sections, marking this as the second game featuring a "Grand Slam"—a team that wins all odds plus the game itself. Nice work, Carolina and bettors.
Source |
Team |
On Open |
On Close |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BetMGM | Las Vegas Raiders | +3 | O 43.5 | +130 | +3 | O 43.5 | +130 | ||
| Washington Commanders | -3 | U 43.5 | -155 | -3.5 | U 43.5 | -155 | |||
By the Public |
MoneyLine |
Spread |
Total Points |
MoneyLine |
Spread |
Total Points |
|||
| Public Bet | Las Vegas Raiders | 11% | 32% | 17% | 12% | 39% | 19% | ||
| Washington Commanders | 89% | 68% | 83% | 88% | 61% | 81% | |||
| Public Money | Las Vegas Raiders | 20% | 50% | 17% | 25% | 61% | 17% | ||
| Washington Commanders | 80% | 50% | 83% | 75% | 39% | 83% | |||
| Yahoo! Sports: Pick Your Winner picks | Las Vegas Raiders | 34% | 35% | ||||||
| Washington Commanders | 66% | 65% | |||||||
Total picks |
15,250 | 18,842 | |||||||
| MSN Sports: Pick the Winner picks | Las Vegas Raiders | 61% | |||||||
| Washington Commanders | 39% | ||||||||
| Box Score | Las Vegas Raiders | 24 | |||||||
| Washington Commanders | 41 | ||||||||
One word: Sacked. Commanders dominated having sacked Geno Smith time and time again. As the game entered the second half, Raiders looked bleak almost looking like they gave up already, sans late scoring in the fourth. In terms of bets, those who bet on Point Spread and Money Line per Washington has won; Total Points won on the side of Las Vegas. Just another decent game, despite handing the Raiders their second loss thus far.
Source |
Team |
On Open |
On Close |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BetMGM | Houston Texans | +1.5 | O 43.5 | +105 | +1.5 | O 43 | +100 | ||
| Jacksonville Jaguars | -1.5 | U 43.5 | -125 | -1.5 | U 43 | -120 | |||
By the Public |
MoneyLine |
Spread |
Total Points |
MoneyLine |
Spread |
Total Points |
|||
| Public Bet | Houston Texans | 42% | 51% | 25% | 43% | 55% | 26% | ||
| Jacksonville Jaguars | 58% | 49% | 75% | 57% | 45% | 74% | |||
| Public Money | Houston Texans | 67% | 77% | 43% | 59% | 86% | 46% | ||
| Jacksonville Jaguars | 33% | 23% | 57% | 41% | 14% | 54% | |||
| Yahoo! Sports: Pick Your Winner picks | Houston Texans | 53% | 53% | ||||||
| Jacksonville Jaguars | 47% | 47% | |||||||
Total picks |
12,666 | 15,686 | |||||||
| MSN Sports: Pick the Winner picks | Houston Texans | 50% | |||||||
| Jacksonville Jaguars | 50% | ||||||||
| Box Score | Houston Texans | 10 | |||||||
| Jacksonville Jaguars | 17 | ||||||||
The final score may not be much, but this, too, came close to the wire. Like the Raiders, Jacksonville sought their quarterback Trevor Lawrence sacked multiple times. Nevertheless, it was a good game despite the low scoring. On the betting side, we have yet another "Grand Slam" in part of Jacksonville, whose bets won all three: Point Spread, Total Points, and Money Line. Not a speck of debris here: Jackonville gave Houston their third loss in a row.
Source |
Team |
On Open |
On Close |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BetMGM | Dallas Cowboys | -1 | O 50.5 | -125 | -1.5 | O 50 | -125 | ||
| Chicago Bears | +1 | U 50.5 | +105 | +1 | U 50 | +105 | |||
By the Public |
MoneyLine |
Spread |
Total Points |
MoneyLine |
Spread |
Total Points |
|||
| Public Bet | Dallas Cowboys | 74% | 42% | 19% | 76% | 44% | 22% | ||
| Chicago Bears | 26% | 58% | 81% | 24% | 56% | 78% | |||
| Public Money | Dallas Cowboys | 90% | 77% | 29% | 80% | 79% | 27% | ||
| Chicago Bears | 10% | 23% | 71% | 20% | 21% | 73% | |||
| Yahoo! Sports: Pick Your Winner picks | Dallas Cowboys | 67% | 66% | ||||||
| Chicago Bears | 33% | 34% | |||||||
Total picks |
17,349 | 23,525 | |||||||
| MSN Sports: Pick the Winner picks | Dallas Cowboys | 78% | |||||||
| Chicago Bears | 22% | ||||||||
| Box Score | Dallas Cowboys | 14 | |||||||
| Chicago Bears | 31 | ||||||||
We have another "Grand Slam" on the side of Chicago. Bettors on the side of Chicago won all three sections: Point Spread, Total Points and Money Line. As for the game, Cowboys grew stale going into the second half; even though Bears took care of business, it was interceptions that costed the Cowboys. Not too shabby of a game, but both fans and bettors came away with a nice "Grand Slam" win with this.
Source |
Team |
On Open |
On Close |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BetMGM | Kansas City Chiefs | -6 | O 45 | -300 | +6 | O 44.5 | -300 | ||
| New York Giants | +6 | U 45 | +240 | +6 | U 44.5 | +240 | |||
By the Public |
MoneyLine |
Spread |
Total Points |
MoneyLine |
Spread |
Total Points |
|||
| Public Bet | Kansas City Chiefs | 95% | 52% | 29% | 93% | 56% | 34% | ||
| New York Giants | 5% | 48% | 71% | 7% | 44% | 66% | |||
| Public Money | Kansas City Chiefs | 97% | 63% | 57% | 92% | 68% | 60% | ||
| New York Giants | 3% | 37% | 43% | 8% | 32% | 40% | |||
| Yahoo! Sports: Pick Your Winner picks | Kansas City Chiefs | 67% | 62% | ||||||
| New York Giants | 33% | 38% | |||||||
Total picks |
16,027 | 27,326 | |||||||
| MSN Sports: Pick the Winner picks | Kansas City Chiefs | 64% | |||||||
| New York Giants | 36% | ||||||||
| Box Score | Kansas City Chiefs | 22 | |||||||
| New York Giants | 9 | ||||||||
Both these teams playing on Sunday Night Football, coming in at a record 0-2. Perhaps some surprises were at play, but the defending champions took care of business. Not too bad as Kansas City, on the betting side, won under Point Spread and Money Line; betting on New York's side, via Total Points, was the only win. That's about it with this game.
Source |
Team |
On Open |
On Close |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BetMGM | Detroit Lions | +4.5 | O 53.5 | +195 | +4.5 | O 54 | +200 | ||
| Baltimore Ravens | -4.5 | U 53.5 | -235 | -4.5 | U 54 | -250 | |||
By the Public |
MoneyLine |
Spread |
Total Points |
MoneyLine |
Spread |
Total Points |
|||
| Public Bet | Detroit Lions | 9% | 36% | 17% | 10% | 34% | 20% | ||
| Baltimore Ravens | 91% | 64% | 83% | 90% | 66% | 80% | |||
| Public Money | Detroit Lions | 46% | 49% | 72% | 13% | 50% | 61% | ||
| Baltimore Ravens | 54% | 51% | 28% | 87% | 50% | 39% | |||
| Yahoo! Sports: Pick Your Winner picks | Detroit Lions | 40% | 42% | ||||||
| Baltimore Ravens | 60% | 58% | |||||||
Total picks |
15,122 | 39,371 | |||||||
| MSN Sports: Pick the Winner picks | Detroit Lions | 52% | |||||||
| Baltimore Ravens | 48% | ||||||||
| Box Score | Detroit Lions | 38 | |||||||
| Baltimore Ravens | 30 | ||||||||
Going in with records 1-1, Detroit handled business. Same can be said on the betting side, with Detroit winning all three sections. You guessed it: This was a "Grand Slam" for both fans and bettors. All those who rooted and/or placed bets on Detroit had a great Monday night.
NFL Week 3 Picks and Results Close |
||
|---|---|---|
| Game | Kris' Pick | Result |
| Miami Dolphins vs. Buffalo Bills | Buffalo Bills | Correct |
| Green Bay Packers vs. Cleveland Browns | Green Bay Packers | Correct |
| Indianapolis Colts vs. Tennessee Titans | Tennessee Titans | Wrong |
| Cincinnati Bengals vs. Minnesota Vikings | Cincinnati Bengals | Wrong |
| Pittsburgh Steelers vs. New England Patriots | Pittsburgh Steelers | Correct |
| New Orleans Saints vs. Seattle Seahawks | New Orleans Saints | Wrong |
| Denver Broncos vs. Los Angeles Chargers | Los Angeles Chargers | Correct |
| Arizona Cardinals vs. San Francisco 49ers | Arizona Cardinals | Wrong |
| Los Angeles Rams vs. Philadelphia Eagles | Los Angeles Rams | Wrong |
| New York Jets vs. Tampa Bay Buccaneers | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | Correct |
| Atlanta Falcons vs. Carolina Panthers | Carolina Panthers | Wrong |
| Las Vegas Raiders vs. Washington Commanders | Las Vegas Raiders | Wrong |
| Houston Texans vs. Jacksonville Jaguars | Jacksonville Jaguars | Correct |
| Dallas Cowboys vs. Chicago Bears | Dallas Cowboys | Correct |
| Kansas City Chiefs vs. New York Giants | New York Giants | Wrong |
| Detroit Lions vs. Baltimore Ravens | Detroit Lions | Correct |
Kris' Results for Week 03 |
||
| Ratio/Percent of Cerrect Picks | 8/16 | 50% |
| Ratio/Percent of Incorrect Picks | 8/16 | 50% |
(These picks were placed personally on both Yahoo! Sports and MSN Sports.)
Interesting how fans, and bettors, pick the winner of games over at MSN Sports. We're not sure if it's team loyalty or just clicking for the heck of it. We say so since fans and bettors over at Yahoo! Sports seem to have more accurate picks. Still, that didn't stop us from participating. Mind you, the picks we made on Yahoo! Sports remained the same on MSN Sports.
Pardon us as we were late to the game, but given our picks, we didn't do too badly—first time doing this in years. However, here we are and look to jump on in the action to show how we did.
How did you do in Week 03? Are you locked in for Week 04? Let's talk about it in the comments below!
Article rating: |
|---|
Kris Caballero
Founder of KCU Network and KCU Plus, Kris has been writing since he managed a personal blog made back in late 2005. Officially back to doing computer programming (software development) and video production, Kris enjoys reading books on Mathematics, Quantum Computing, Philosophy, playing old video/DOS games, digital video archiving, and listening to sports, public radio and classical music.
Comments
This policy contains information about your privacy. By posting, you are declaring that you understand this policy:
- Your name, rating, website address, town, country, state and comment will be publicly displayed if entered.
- Aside from the data entered into these form fields, other stored data about your comment will include:
- Your IP address (not displayed)
- The time/date of your submission (displayed)
- Your email address will not be shared. It is collected for only two reasons:
- Administrative purposes, should a need to contact you arise.
- To inform you of new comments, should you subscribe to receive notifications.
- A cookie may be set on your computer. This is used to remember your inputs. It will expire by itself.
This policy is subject to change at any time and without notice.
These terms and conditions contain rules about posting comments. By submitting a comment, you are declaring that you agree with these rules:
- Although the administrator will attempt to moderate comments, it is impossible for every comment to have been moderated at any given time.
- You acknowledge that all comments express the views and opinions of the original author and not those of the administrator.
- You agree not to post any material which is knowingly false, obscene, hateful, threatening, harassing or invasive of a person's privacy.
- The administrator has the right to edit, move or remove any comment for any reason and without notice.
Failure to comply with these rules may result in being banned from submitting further comments.
These terms and conditions are subject to change at any time and without notice.



Comments